Warning: Declaration of thesis_comment::start_lvl(&$output, $depth, $args) should be compatible with Walker::start_lvl(&$output, $depth = 0, $args = Array) in /homepages/23/d73883506/htdocs/dramming/wp-content/themes/thesis_185/lib/classes/comments.php on line 166

Warning: Declaration of thesis_comment::end_lvl(&$output, $depth, $args) should be compatible with Walker::end_lvl(&$output, $depth = 0, $args = Array) in /homepages/23/d73883506/htdocs/dramming/wp-content/themes/thesis_185/lib/classes/comments.php on line 166

Warning: Declaration of thesis_comment::start_el(&$output, $comment, $depth, $args) should be compatible with Walker::start_el(&$output, $object, $depth = 0, $args = Array, $current_object_id = 0) in /homepages/23/d73883506/htdocs/dramming/wp-content/themes/thesis_185/lib/classes/comments.php on line 166

Warning: Declaration of thesis_comment::end_el(&$output, $comment, $depth, $args) should be compatible with Walker::end_el(&$output, $object, $depth = 0, $args = Array) in /homepages/23/d73883506/htdocs/dramming/wp-content/themes/thesis_185/lib/classes/comments.php on line 166
Springbank/Longrow/Hazelburn — Dramming


Springbank 12 yo Green

May 21, 2015
Thumbnail image for Springbank 12 yo Green

The lack of sherry influence makes this a slightly unusual Springbank but the pedigree always is clear. It does feel as if something is missing though. – Rating: 83/100

Springbank 2000/2012 Calvados Wood

May 22, 2014
Thumbnail image for Springbank 2000/2012 Calvados Wood

The apple flavours are a perfect match for the briny Springbank house style. Even though the whisky has matured in Calvados casks for 6 years, the distillery character is not overpowered in any way. – Rating: 87/100

Longrow Red 11 yo

May 7, 2013
Thumbnail image for Longrow Red 11 yo

The wine influence is bold, and you can see it in the colour. But it works surprisingly well. – Rating: 86/100

Springbank 19 yo Cask 129 and 482 Master of Malt

February 20, 2013
Thumbnail image for Springbank 19 yo Cask 129 and 482 Master of Malt

Two rather different Springers compared head to head – Ratings: 84/100 and 88/100

Springbank Batch 1 – That Boutique-y Whisky Company

February 4, 2013
Thumbnail image for Springbank Batch 1 – That Boutique-y Whisky Company

Quite a spicy Springbank expression, especially with added water. Overall character is rather light but creamy. – Rating: 84/100

Springbank 1972 For Taiwan

June 25, 2012

What can you say? It’s magnificent. It has that hard to find quality to be both mild and strong at the same time. – Rating: 93/100

Springbank 1995/2011 Hart Brothers

May 6, 2012

A nicely flavoured but very much toned down whisky that is reluctant to give away its secrets. – Rating: 74/100

Springbank Rundlets & Kilderkins

April 30, 2012
Thumbnail image for Springbank Rundlets & Kilderkins

The small cask maturation creates strong wood spices that almost overpower the spirit. Luckily it was bottled soon enough, so we can still enjoy a very nice dram. – Rating: 86/100

Springbank 1995/2010 A. D. Rattray

April 26, 2012

This dram has a very impressive nose and nice flavours, but palate and finish are just too weak to deliver what the nose promised. – Rating: 84/100

Springbank 1992/2011 Berry Bros.

March 30, 2012

Pretty much a quintessential Springbank with a very nice freshness. Even though it is not cask strength the flavours are densely packed yet delicate. – Rating: 89/100

Longrow 1999/2010 for Usquebaugh Society

January 5, 2012

The trademark combination of brininess with citrus zests makes this a typical specimen from the Springbank distillery. Very good but also very expensive for a 10 yo. – Rating: 88/100

Springbank 1992/2011 Berry Bros.

August 4, 2011

The age does not show at all here. In one way it is a rather typical – or should I say generic? – Springbank, but I can’t help the feeling there is something missing here. – Rating: 82/100

Hazelburn 8 yo Cask Strength

June 20, 2011
Thumbnail image for Hazelburn 8 yo Cask Strength

Even though it is only 8 years, this malt shows some characertistics of older whiskies. There is a lot going on in this fine and richly flavoured dram. – Rating: 85/100

Hazelburn 2002/2011 Sauternes Finish

May 25, 2011
Thumbnail image for Hazelburn 2002/2011 Sauternes Finish

The sweet wine finish puts the trademark orange notes into the background. A quite enjoyable malt, but there seems to be some sulphur present that contrary to my usual preferences does detract a bit. – Rating: 82/100

Springbank 12 yo Cask Strength

April 12, 2011
Thumbnail image for Springbank 12 yo Cask Strength

I was told it was sulphured, but I found a very pleasant and typical Springbank. The combination of spice and citrus fruit with gentle smoke in a maritime setting is much to my liking. – Rating: 86/100

Longrow 14 yo Sherry Cask Finish

April 7, 2011
Thumbnail image for Longrow 14 yo Sherry Cask Finish

The sherry has mellowed out the peatiness of the Longrow a bit. The result is a stunning and well-balanced dram that perfectly combines fruitiness with smoke. – Rating: 89/100

Springbank 18 yo

December 28, 2010
Thumbnail image for Springbank 18 yo

A quintessential Springbank with a silky mouthfeel, very complex with lots of flavours to discover. It can act both as a winter warmer and a summer refreshment. – Rating: 88/100

Hazelburn 12 yo 2010

November 12, 2010
Thumbnail image for Hazelburn 12 yo 2010

The new version is lighter and more floral that the 2009 release. Unfortunately it has lost some of the richness and complexity, so overall I prefer last’s years edition. – Rating: 84/100

Springbank 10 yo

May 27, 2010
Thumbnail image for Springbank 10 yo

A great balance of flavours, accessible enough for an everyday dram but with a complexity that keeps it interesting for a long time. – Score: 86/100

Longrow 10yo 100 Proof

March 3, 2010
Thumbnail image for Longrow 10yo 100 Proof

Most enjoyable and suprisingly little peat. In a blind test I might have guessed “Cask strength Hazelburn” because is has that typical spicy orange profile. – Score: 88/100